首页> 外文OA文献 >Possible explanations for why some countries were harder hit by the pandemic influenza virus in 2009 - a global mortality impact modeling study
【2h】

Possible explanations for why some countries were harder hit by the pandemic influenza virus in 2009 - a global mortality impact modeling study

机译:关于全球死亡率影响模型研究的一些可能原因,解释了为什么一些国家在2009年受到大流行性流感病毒的打击更大

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: A global pandemic mortality study found prominent regional mortality variations in 2009 for Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Our study attempts to identify factors that explain why the pandemic mortality burden was high in some countries and low in others. METHODS: As a starting point, we identified possible risk factors worth investigating for Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 mortality through a targeted literature search. We then used a modeling procedure (data simulations and regression models) to identify factors that could explain differences in respiratory mortality due to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. We ran sixteen models to produce robust results and draw conclusions. In order to assess the role of each factor in explaining differences in excess pandemic mortality, we calculated the reduction in between country variance, which can be viewed as an effect-size for each factor. RESULTS: The literature search identified 124 publications and 48 possible risk factors, of which we were able to identify 27 factors with appropriate global datasets. The modelling procedure indicated that age structure (explaining 40% of the mean between country variance), latitude (8%), influenza A and B viruses circulating during the pandemic (3-8%), influenza A and B viruses circulating during the preceding influenza season (2-6%), air pollution (pm10; 4%) and the prevalence of other infections (HIV and TB) (4-6%) were factors that explained differences in mortality around the world. Healthcare expenditure, levels of obesity, the distribution of antivirals, and air travel did not explain global pandemic mortality differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that countries with a large proportion of young persons had higher pandemic mortality rates in 2009. The co-circulation of influenza viruses during the pandemic and the circulation of influenza viruses during the preceding season were also associated with pandemic mortality rates. We found that real time assessments of 2009 pandemic mortality risk factors (e.g. obesity) probably led to a number of false positive findings.
机译:背景:一项全球大流行死亡率研究发现,2009年甲型H1N1流感暴发地区的主要死亡率差异很大。我们的研究试图找出解释为什么大流行死亡率负担在某些国家中较高而在其他国家中较低的因素。方法:作为一个起点,我们通过有针对性的文献检索,确定了值得研究的甲型(H1N1)pdm09死亡率的可能危险因素。然后,我们使用了建模程序(数据模拟和回归模型)来确定可以解释由甲型H1N1流感致死性呼吸道疾病致死率差异的因素。我们运行了16个模型以产生可靠的结果并得出结论。为了评估每个因素在解释大流行性超额死亡率差异中的作用,我们计算了国家间差异的减少量,这可以看作是每个因素的效应量。结果:文献检索确定了124种出版物和48种可能的危险因素,其中我们能够通过适当的全球数据集确定27种因素。建模程序表明年龄结构(解释了国家差异之间的平均值的40%),纬度(8%),在大流行期间传播的甲型和乙型流感病毒(3-8%),前一次流行的甲型和乙型流感病毒流感季节(2-6%),空气污染(pm10; 4%)和其他感染的流行率(HIV和TB)(4-6%)是解释世界各地死亡率差异的因素。医疗保健支出,肥胖症水平,抗病毒药的分布以及航空旅行并不能解释全球大流行病死亡率的差异。结论:我们的研究发现,年轻人比例较高的国家在2009年的大流行死亡率较高。大流行期间流感病毒的共同传播和上一季节的流感病毒传播也与大流行死亡率相关。我们发现,对2009年大流行性死亡风险因素(例如肥胖症)进行实时评估可能会导致许多假阳性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号